Contents copyright Herb Johnson 2014. Last update Mar 7 2014. Quoted material here may be copyrighted by the respective authors of that material and I use it with permission. For more info or for reuse or questions, email me via this Web link. Corrections are appreciated.
For more info on floppy disk drives, diskette and controller info, check our list of original floppy drive manuals and OEM tech notes. We offer copies for a per page fee. Check the Shugart 800/801 floppy disk drive documents there for tech notes on the design and use of early floppy drives and media.
My additional Web pages about floppy drives and diskettes:
To respond to questions reading and writing to diskettes under various combinations of drives and disk media, you need to know the terminology, some knowledge about how diskettes are read and written, and then some actual numbers from standards on various floppy media and drives.
Terminology: a diskette has a cover or sleeve or envelope, which has inside a circular disk of plastic covered with a magnetic coating. The inner disk is sometimes called a "doughnut"; the disk material is called "the media". The outer sleeve has a "slot" which is where the read/write head contacts the inner diskette. (On 3.5" diskettes the slot is covered with a "door", and the sleve is hard plastic.) The sleeve also has a central "spindle hole" for the floppy drive spindle to grab and rotate the diskette. Some diskettes (except 3.5") have a "index hole" in the sleeve, which exposes a small punched-out hole in the inner disk; that hole indicates the beginning of a disk track. The read/write head is "stepped" from track to track as the disk rotates. Each track has several sectors, each of which hold a set number of data bytes. The data capacity of the diskette is the number of tracks times the number of sectors times the amount of data per sector.
Diskettes spin at some rotational speed under a read/write head. The head is some distance from the center of rotation so the actual radial speed of the media, and therefore the density of flux changes or bits per radial inch of the media, will vary. The innermost track will have the highest physical density (or lineal density) of bits as the media is moving at the slowest radial speed. But the FREQUENCY of the flux changes (the bit data rate) is the same for all tracks.
Data can be corrupted if the tracks are too close together. Some media support more data density: that media has "higher coerecivity" than media which supports less data density.
Data is written by writing a data track with a write head which is followed by a "tunnel erase" pair of heads to erase data on either side of the data track. From manufacturer's notes: The "tunnel erase ceramic type [heads form] non-recorded areas between each track to avoid crosstalk and increase interchangability". And, "when writing, the head erases the outer edges of the track to ensure the data recorded will not exceed the ..track width". Some information below reports the width of the data track before and after the tunnel erase.
Numbers and measurements from standards for disk drives and media are in the following section.
Here are the hot charts for various drives and formats. Some odd but useful facts are also reported.
12-inch flexible disk drives and media - apparently a proprietary scheme used on some 1960's, 1970's minicomputers or mainframe computers. Please provide me with any information YOU have on this technology, WITH SPECIFIC TECHNICAL AND BRAND REFERENCES. - Herb Johnson 8-inch drives, 76 or 77 tracks: track 0 on outer circumference, track 77 near hub. track bit density, innermost track (76 or 77) 3200-3600 bpi for single density, 6400-6500 bpi for double density rotation speed 360 RPM track density 48 tpi (tracks per inch) track width: .012 inches (Shugart) .013 inches (Siemens) Track erase width: about .006 inches either side of width also see erase notes track interval: .0208 inches (siemens) data frequency 250Kbps, FM single density 500Kbps, MFM double density write current reduced when writing to tracks > 43 explicit input signal on older drives, internal signal on later drives media: iron oxide coating, 300 oersteds coercivity all formats orientation of index hole in diskette sleve/cover, soft sectored: (hold disk flat to you, oval slot "down") single sided: above center spindle hole, just right of center double sided: above center spindle hole, but well to right orientation of index hole in diskette sleve/cover for hard sectored: inner disk has sector holes to mark start of each sector index hole is centered between two sector holes hard sectored: sleeve hole above center spindle hole, just right of center EARLY hard sectored: index and sector holes around EDGE of inner disk and sleeve resistor terminator: resistor pack, GENERALLY eight parallel 100-ohm sleeve material: dilithium/paper matrix 5.25 inch drives, 40 track (early drives 35 track) track bit density, innermost track (track 1) 2500-2900 bpi for single density, 5600-5900 bpi for double density data frequency 125Kb/sec single density FM 250Kb/sec double density MFM rotation speed 300 RPM track density 48 tpi (tracks per inch) typical head stepper motor angle per step: 3.6 degrees capacity 250KB single density (less formatted) 500KB single density (less formatted) drive track radius from center (inner to outer) 1.542 inches to 2.250 inches (maybe 35 track?) 1.354 inches to 2.25 inches see 35-track drives and media see 100 tpi 5.25" drives Track width: .012-.013 inch Track erase width: about .006 inches either side of width also see erase notes Track interval .0208 inches resistor terminator: resistor pack, Generally 100-150 ohms, may be 220 to +5, 330 to gnd - check docs Diskette and Media: Mylar, 0.003 in thick (.0008mm) iron oxide coating, 300 oersteds coercivity same media for single and double density media slot for read/write head: 1.210" long for 35 track, 1.370" for 40 track slot is .13" from outer edge of envelope for BOTH see notes on "35 track drives and media" orientation of index hole in diskette sleve/cover: (hold disk face up, slot down toward you) right side of spindle hole, slightly toward slot hard sectored: inner disk has sector holes to mark start of each sector index hole on inner disk is centered between two sector holes 5.25 inch drives, 720K DD, 80 track track bit density, innermost track 3000 bpi for single density (SD) FM 6000 bpi for double density (DD) MFM rotation speed 300 RPM track density 96 tpi (tracks per inch) (some drives 100 tpi, see index at top) (double step to create 48tpi 40 track diskettes) head stepper motor angle 1.8 degrees capacity 500KB single density (less formatted) 1MB double density (less formatted) data frequency 125Kbps, FM single density 250Kbps, MFM double density track radius ??? (probably similar to 40 track drives?) Track width before tunnel erase .0065 inch after erase "to not exceed .006 inch". (note: narrower track than 360K drives) Track interval (implied): .0104 inches media: iron oxide coating, 300 oersteds coercivity orientation of index hole: see previous 5.25" description resistor terminator: resistor pack, Generally 100-150 ohms, may be 220 to +5, 330 to gnd - check docs 5.25 inch drives, 1.2M HD, 80 track (note: for use at 360K or 720K, see previous specs ex. following: data frequency vs rotation speed (older pre-PC type, see notes) 125Kbps, FM single density at 300RPM 250Kbps, MFM double density at 300RPM 500Kbps, MFM high density at 360RPM data frequency vs rotation speed (IBM-PC type, see notes) 300Kbps, MFM double density at 360RPM 500Kbps, MFM high density at 360RPM track HD bit density, innermost track 9600-9800 bpi for high density MFM track density 96 tpi (tracks per inch) head step angle 1.8 degrees Track width: .16 mm (.0063 inch), also .0061 inch HD media: cobalt coating, 600 oersteds coercivity orientation of index hole: see previous 5.25" description (except no hard sectored HD diskettes) resistor terminator: resistor pack, Generally 100-150 ohms, may be 220 to +5, 330 to gnd - check docs 3.5 inch drives, 720K (1MB) and 1.44M (2MB) and 2.88M (4MB) rotation speed: 300 RPM track density 135 tpi; 80 tracks per side; IBM MS-DOS sectors per track 9, 18, 36 respectively track 0 on outer circumference, track 79 innermost near hub. head step angle 1.8 degrees data frequency 250Kbps, MFM double density DD 500Kbps, MFM high density HD 1Mbps, ?MFM?? 2.88M extended density ED innermost track bit density: 8717 bpi at 720K; 17,434 bpi at 1.44M; 34,848 at 2.88M for MFM use; for FM use divide by 2 media: cobalt, DD media is 665 oersteds at 720K (1MB? unformatted); longitudinal recording; HD media is 720 oersteds at 1.44M (2MB unformatted); longitudinal recording barium ferrite, [unconfirmed 1200 oersteds] at 2.88M (4MB unformatted), perpendicular recording track spacing: .0074 inches drive track radius from center (inner to outer) side 0 .9719 inches to 1.5551 inches side 1 .9129 inches to 1.4961 inches track width: .115 mm (.0045 inch) after "trim erase" on either side (not confirmed for 4MB format) also see erase notes orientation of index hole: none, inner diskette self-aligns with drive spindle resistor terminator: resistor SIM, often soldered in, note: 4MB standard created by Toshiba, endorsed by IBM. See AP-358, Intel reference below. 3.5 inch drives Apple Macintosh, 400K, 800K (1MB) and 1.4M (2MB) note: 20-pin controller interface versus 34-pin rotation speed: under software control, 394-590 RPM, see below track density: probably same as other 3.5" floppy drives 80 tracks per side; only 400K drive is single-sided track 0 on outer circumference, track 79 innermost near hub. head step angle: unknown data frequency: see below, otherwise for MS-DOS same as MFM 720K/1.44M standards media: same as 3.5" double-density 360K, and 3.5" High-density 1.44M orientation of index hole: none, disk media self-aligns with drive spindle resistor terminator: unknown source for information: various documents referenced in http://68kmla.org/forums/ look for discussions of "Macintosh floppy drive rotation speed" Apple document "Double-Density versus High-Density Disks" describes 400K and 800K as GCR encoded, and 720K and 1.44MB MS-DOS as MFM. Apple GCR encodes four data bits into five recorded bits at higher density. For uniform GCR data density per inch, track speed varies as follows. 800K tracks 0-15 at 394 RPM and 12 sectors per track (innermost) 16-31 429 11 32-47 472 10 48-63 525 9 800K tracks 64-79 at 590 RPM for 8 sectors per track (simple math says 800 sectors X 2 sides for 800K => 512 bytes/sector) 1.44MB MFM is 300 RPM for 18 sectors/track all 80 tracks 3.5 inch drives, 1.6M (mode available for some 1.44M HD drives) same specifcations as 3.5 inch 1.44M (2.0M unformatted) drive, except: rotation speed: 360 RPM data frequency: 500Kbps, MFM high density HD innermost track bit density: 14528 bpi media: HD - cobalt, 720 oersteds; longitudinal recording drives in this mode operate "like" 8-inch double-density drives see notes on 360 RPM or 1.6M operation below
Shugart SA-400, SA-410, SA-460 manuals & spec sheets
Tandon TM100-1, -2, -3, -4 manuals
Canon MDD-210, -220 manuals
Calcomp 140, 142, 143 manuals
CDC, MPI BR80 manuals
Teac FD235HF, GF specification manuals
IBM diskette spec. manual Sony MPF920 documents
Navy training manual: Fire Controlman, Volume 03 -
Digital Data Systems, NRTC 14100. Chapter 10. (Public distribution)
Floppy Disk Drive Construction and Operation - PC Guide, Disk Edition
Data obtained under "fair use" doctrine. LInk fails April 2006.
mitsumi floppy disk manuals on-line, 3.5" drives
"3M Diskette Reference Manual" of 15 February 1990, courtesy Don Maslin
Siemens OEM Technical manuals, FDD-100-8 drive
TEAC FD-05HF dual density 1M/2M drive manual (thanx to "craigm" for this doc)
Intel AP-358, Intel 820077SL for Super Dense Floppies, 1992, 292093-002 thanks to this PS/2 Web site for referring to the Intel document.
S. M. wrote to me in May 2007 with this question: "Question about the 3.5" floppy drive days...When a low-level format is done on a floppy disk, where is sector 1, track 1? Is it on the outside of the cookie magnetic platter, or the inside (like optical media are written from the inside out)?"
Sectors are numbered from "1"; tracks are numbered from "0". A few odd formats, from the days before floppy disk controller chips, had a sector zero.
From the introduction of the 8-inch floppy drive by IBM, the outermost track along the outer radius is track 0; the highest numbered track is closest to the "hub". If you can observe the head during operation, and operate a 3.5" floppy drive during format, you can see the head goes from outer edge toward the hub. (This MIGHT not apply to the very very earliest 8-inch hard sectored disks with sector holes along the EDGE. Hard sectored disks which came later all had sector holes and index hole near the HUB.)
Why start from the edge? It's harder to write data near the hub. The media has the lowest velocity as it moves past the head, so it demands the highest physical flux density per area. Evidence of this is when marginal disks fail near the end of formatting; or when double density media are formatted at high density and also fail near the "end" at the hub tracks. Early 5.25-inch floppy drives were 35 track; they standardized on 40 track soon, when media and electronics improved.
This track information is referenced in some, older, floppy drive specification manuals. I got this info for 3.5" drives from a Teac FD235 manual.
In this section I'll talk about track widths and erase operations, with specifications when I have them.
Here are quotes from 8-inch floppy drive manuals about track widths and track erase functions. Keep in mind that track-to-track spacing is .208 inches. From Shugart "SA800/801 Diskette Storage Drive - Service Manual", the SA800/801 ceramic head is a single element read/write head with straddle erase elements to provide erased areas between tracks...(page 1-1):
"The read/write head contains three coils. When writing, the head erases the outer edge of the track to insure data recorded will not exceed the .012 inch track width... Two read/write coils are wound on a single core, center tapped and one erase coil is wound on a yoke which spans the track being written. ..On a write operation, the erase coil is energized. This causes the outer edges of the track to be trim erased. Therefore as the track is being recorded it will not "splash over" to adjacent tracks. (page 1-17)". (Similar text is in the Shugart SA840/841 drive service manual.)
From "Siemens OEM Technical manual FDD-100-8 drive - specifications", page 1-14:
"Read/write gap: single gap straddle-erase
Read/write-to-erase gap spacing; .035 inch
Track Width: .013 inch
Erase Width: .006 inch (on either side of track)
Spacing between tracks: .02083 inch"
From the Siemens manual, page 3-4: "The read/write head also contains a tunnel-erase or straddle-erase electromagnet, the function of which is to erase the edges of the recorded track as the data is being written. The width of the track is narrowed to approximately 0.013 inch by this technique, to minimize the effect of data previously written on the track and possible crosstalk between tracks."
Discussion in the Siemens manual makes it clear that "tunnel erase" is one kind of head, and "straddle erase" is another kind of head; and that erase operation is concurrent with write. For instance pages 3-26 thru 3-29 describe the erase gating and logic during write: "The purpose of the auto erase feature is to provide the necessary turn-on delay between active WRITE and ERASE and the turn-off delay after WRITE goes inactive, but for tunnel-erase heads only. This is for option TE installed. Straddle-erase heads use option SE , which bypasses the delay circuits." A sketch of the tunnel-erased track shows that it measures .013 inches wide. The next document gives an explanation for why a delay is needed.
A CDC (Control Data) application note "5.25 inch FDD format considerations and controller compatibilities" examines 8-inch drive technology and standards. It refers specifically to tunnel erase vs. straddle erase in the introduction, saying "The head style and drive tolerances determine the minimum gap of the 5.25-inch FDD formats". The two erase heads as used on 8-inch floppy drives are described on page 7 as follows:
"Both head styles have as common parts a read/write gap and two erase gaps...The two erase gaps are used to erase guard bands on both sides of the data being written. These guard bands are necessary to to eliminate noise caused by old data that had been written slightly off track...A major difference between the two heads is the placement of the erase gaps....The erase gaps of the tunnel erase head are 36 mills behind the R/W gap whereas with the straddle erase head the gaps are on both sides of the R/W gap and extend approximately 11 mills behind it...Because the erase gaps of the tunnel erase head are so far from the write gap they must be turned on and off seperately." Sketches of tracks for each head show that with the tunnel erase head, "used by IBM and most manufacturers", there is 6 mills of erase gap either side of the 13-mill track. With the straddle erase head "used by Shugart exclusively", each 6-mill erase gap is offset from the 13-mill track by 1-2 mills."
The CDC document describes the IBM and Shugart 5.25 inch 48TPI format as "modified [from] the IBM full size floppy format". Most of the document's discussion is about the changes needed for erase delay due to those modifications, but other changes and tolerances are discussed.
Quotes from 5.25-inch floppy drive manuals will be added in due course. Look at the CDC app note cited above for some ideas in the meantime. Other documents for these drives state a track width of .0124 to .013 inches, spaced at .0208 inches. The 5.25-inch diskettes for single and double density also use the same physical media as the 8-inch disketes. Consequently they should have similar design issues as do the 8-inch drives.
Here are quotes from 3.5-inch floppy drive manuals. From the "TEAC FD-05HF dual density 1M/2M drive manual", (p7), this 3.5-inch DD/HD drive has a "read/write head with erase gap, 2 sets", presumably one head for each side. There is no reference in this document to any erase current or logic, and no schematic, so I don't know if the erase head(s) are offset from the write head as described in the CDC note above. The track width "after erase trim" is .0045 +/- .00003 inches which suggests the use of erase bands trimming either side of the track. The radial span between the side 0 (lower) track and the side 1(upper) track is about .059 inches. That is, the side 1 head gap is closer to the hub by that amount.
In the course of a discussion in Usenet newsgroup "comp.os.cpm" in January 2006 on "kaypro format" diskettes, there was some references to diskette standards. I'm quoting what I posted because it includes specific documentation references that may be useful to anyone who wants to know the "standards" for floppy diskettes in use. I also list some document references at the end of my description of Data about floppy drives and media on this Web page. You might also check the Web sites or Usenet posts of the posters in the disucssion: namely Dave Dunfield and Allison Parent. - Herb Johnson
Regarding specifications for floppy formats, let's see what Shugart said in "SA800 Series Diskette Storage Drive - Double Density Design Guide - Application Note" #3900 10/77. It's very specific about bit fields, encoding and efficiency - the issues mentioned in this thread. It mentions the "ID field" as including an ID as a "four byte address containing cylinder number, head number, record number and record length". Cylinder and record refer to track and sector, respectively. There are tables for optimized record lengths versus number of records, from 1 to 32 records (for both single and double density).
The term "record number" and "number of records" are both used in the document. There is no reference to values for the ID field for any of those four parameters.
Let's see..Shugart's "SA800/801 Diskette Storage Drive - OEM manual" says the diskette "can be written interchangably between any SA800 and IBM 3741/42, 3747 and 3540". For recording format it says "...for a detailed discussion..the designer should read one of the following: IBM Compatibility Manual, Shugart Associates Double Density Design Guide, SA801/901 Track Formats". There is no discussion of format in this document.
Shugart's "SA800/801 Diskette Storage Drive - Theory of Operations" does provide bit-level descriptions of format. Section "2.5 - Tracks" says "the tracks are numbered 0-76". Section 2.7 discusses track formats, and mentions the "ID field" as described earlier but not the values in that field. That lack may be deliberate, as for instance in desribing the CRC for each field (2.7.3) it mentions a "generator polynomial" but does not give the specific one.
The Shugart SA800 Service Manual of 1981, interestingly enough, shows the ID field as "track number, zeros, sector, sector length" bytes. Also, the above Shugart docments discuss hard sector formats, and I note by its absence any "ID" field. The hard sector format is simply a gap, data, and a gap; one apparently counts sector holes from the index hole to obtain a record or sector position.
I don't have the Shugart "track formats" document for SA800 drives. There is apparently a similar document for SA400 drives.
I do have a CDC (Control Data) application note 75897469 Jan 1980, "5.25 inch FDD format considerations and controller compatibilities". It says "an industry standard for 5.25 double density has not been defined: however a de facto standard format has resulted from the LSI controllers being designed for 5.25..as well as full-sized [8-inch] data rates." Most of the issues in this document are about field gaps. It's an informative document as it surveys a number of floppy controller boards and FDC chips. The CDC document refers to a number of incompatibilities among various LSI controller chips. The reference page list several documents, including as follows:
IBM Compatibility Reference Manual, Shugart, 39002 (likely a Shugart
doc & number);
IBM One-Sided Diskette OEM Information, IBM, GA21-9190-3;
IBM Two-Sided Diskette OEM Information, IBM, GA21-9257-1;
ANSI draft 5 5.25" MEdia Standard, ANSI, X3B8/78-150
ECMA 130mm Media Standard, ECMA, TC 19/78/17
From all this, I conclude that IBM set the format standards initially; then Shugart with the SA 800/801; later the standards were de facto set by the FDC chip manufacturers, not always consistently. That is consistent with comments in this discussion thread. " - Herb Johnson
Additional Web searching in April 2006 found this document link to an IBM Journal article "the IBM Diskette and Diskette Drive" which is a history of IBM's work. It includes two references:
IBM Diskettes I , 2, and 20, Original Equipment Manufacturers Information, Order No. GA21-9388, IBM Corporation, Old Orchard Kd., Armonk, NY 10504.
The IBM Diskette General Information Manual, Order No. GA21-9182, IBM Corporation, Old Orchard Rd., Armonk, NY 10504.
1) Hard sector means that the DISKETTE (not the drive) has multiple holes, one for each sector. Normal (soft sectored) diskettes have only ONE hole to mark the "index" or beginning of a track. There is a small hole in the envelope (8-inch, 5.25-inch) which exposes this hole to the disk drive. For hard sectored disks, there are additional holes to mark the beginning of each sector. The index hole is an additional hole between two sector holes.
2) 5.25 inch hard sector diskettes came with 10 sector (11 holes) and rarely 16 sector (17 holes). To count holes, grab a diskette. Rotate the "doughnut" inside the diskette's envelope and count the holes. Remember the index hole is in between two sector holes (so a smaller spacing). Classic systems which used 5.25 inch hard sectored diskettes include Heath H89 (10 sector), NorthStar (10 sector).
3)For 8-inch diskettes, hard sectored diskettes came with 32 sectors (33 holes). These disks were otherwise identical to soft-sectored 8-inch diskettes. But, there was another, even older hard-sectored scheme, where the index hole was near the outer edge of the envelope and far offset from center. Details on the older version are below.
4)While in most cases, it's the MEDIA not the DRIVE which determines hard-sectored operation, there were some 8-inch drives (Shugart 800 and 801) which provided circuitry to generate hard sector pulses from soft sectored diskettes. (Or was that to filter hard sector pulses OUT from hard sectored diskettes? Check with the Shugart 800/801 manual, or let me know, or ask ME to check the manual!)
Here's some publically posted information from Usenet group comp.os.cpm by Jeff Jonas in May 2005 comments in 's are mine.
"[The] Vydec work processor [in 1973] used such 8" floppy disks in a non-standard sleeve with a notched corner to prevent backwards insertion. Hard sectored, holes on the outer edge....Google found sound notes (no photos) at: this site [which describes the earliest use of 8-inch floppy drives in late 1972 by Technology Unlimited Inc. (TUI), later known as MTU.]
The EASTON Foundation ESDF newsletter for SEpt-Oct 2004 at esdf.org has an article, "the Dead CD-ROMs", which notes: "The career of the future: data archaeologist. We could not read hieroglyphics before the Rosetta Stone and someday someone will hold a Vydec word processor floppy disk in their hands and not know that it rotated counter clockwise for reading and writing." ---end quote--
A Vydec 1880 is in the Rhode Island Computer Museum collection.
Proof that hard sectored disks are just soft-sectored disks with more holes, is shown by multiple successful efforts to hand-punch diskettes. This German Web page shows a punch tool. In 2010 a colleague Dwight Elvey had plans to make a punch as well. Read a 2011 account at this link, about making Northstar compatible diskettes with an Elvey punch.- Herb
The Shugart 800/801 is an 8-inch single sided floppy drive. I believe the 800 model is used for soft sectored applications; the 801 for hard sectored applications. A jumper on the drive's electronics card (800/801) selects this feature. Other jumpers on the card may need to be changed as well.
Of the various 800/801 models I've seen, there is a lot of variation in their circuit boards. I'll try to catalog them here.
The circuit board model 25136-* (where * is a revision number apparently) has a large IC in the center of the board which is PARALLEL to the 50-pin cable edge connector. Regarding revisions, I've seen -1 and a -4 as a photocopy.
The circuit board model 25229-* (where * is a revision number apparently) has a large IC in the center of the board which is PERPENDICULAR to the 50-pin cable edge connector. Regarding revisions, I've seen -1.
The circuit board model 25102-* (where * is a revision number apparently) has NO LARGE IC at all; and has three power transistors (TO-3 cases) along one side of the circuit board. Regarding revisions, I've seen -4.
Sources: Shugart 800/801 manual and drive inspection.
There have been some questions about adjusting the rotation rate of floppy drives. Floppy drives rotate the floppy on a spindle, which is driven by some motor. Many drives allow for adjusting that speed via a small pot (potentiometer, a variable resistor) on the circuit board connected to the spindle motor. AC powered spindles don't have an adjustment, the AC line frequency and the mechanics set the speed.
That spindle often had a decal or lable which consisted of a series of black bars, radially around the edge of the spindle, a kind of star-burst pattern. Some of them were labled "60" and "50" with slightly different patterns. Typical rotation speeds are 300 RPM and 360 RPM, depending on the drive size and density of the diskette's format.
Those lables are actually stroboscopic patterns. If you use a neon lamp or some fluorscent lamps, the 60 HZ (or 50 HZ) line current variations in the lamp would cause the rotating pattern to stand still, IF the drive was at speed. If it was slow or fast, the pattern would appear to rotate slowly. The tech would adjust a small pot to change the speed. Most older floppy drives are not crystal controlled.
At one time, I made a photocopy of one of those patterns, and simply placed it on any drive which did not have such a decal to tune up the speed. Of course, you need different patterns for 300 rpm and 360 rpm, and physically different sizes for 5.25 and 8-inch floppy drives (the size is only a convenience, patterns for the same speed have the same number of stripes).
If response warrents I could scan these patterns and put them up on my Web site, otherwise just look over your old drives and see if you have some. Dual speed drives (later 5.25 inch floppies) would require the use of two of these patterns. Also, some diagnostic software on some systems simply time the index hole to compute spindle RPM; one could do the same with a counter electronically connected to the output of the index sensor on the drive.
On many early 8-inch floppy drives, there is an input signal called "track 43" or "> track 43". Here's some descriptions about that signal.
Dave Dunfield wrote on this: "8-inch drives/media require reduced write current past track 43 (out of 77 total). Earlier [8-inch] drives required the controller to assert a "Track Greater than 43" signal on the interface to reduce the write current - some later drives figured this out automatically (which makes them handy for interfacing to a PC controller which does not provide this signal). I have a fair bit of coverage of this and other drive related issues in my ImageDisk documentation." Here's a link to Dave's Old Computers Web site for some of the software and information Dave Dunfield has referenced.
But Mike Yetso informed me in Sept 2009: "Early drives did in fact change at track 43. Two things were done, but if I recall, only the first was done on floppys that used FM and MFM. That was reduced write current. This was to limit self erasure due to bit density as the velocity of the media under the head slowed due to the circumference at that track radius shrinking. The other was 'precomp', but that was actually done in the controller, and I think mostly in RLL and ESDI formats for hard disk, which is best described as it changed how the data was actually shaped to be written so that it was distorted in one direction so that when it was distorted at the media, it would cancel and come out correct. I seem to recall it was used in some floppy systems, but if so it was rare and not really needed. But as drives and controllers got more adept, everything seemed to become automated [in the drive]."
In Aug 2002 there was a discussion in newsgroup (discussion group) comp.os.cpm of 5.25-inch diskette drive speeds and data rates for 360K/720K operation vs. 1.2M operation (see this document for technical details. According to Axel Berger, a regular correspondent:
"As to speed: There are two standardized bit rates, 250 kb/s and 500 kb/s. DD 5.25" and all 3.5" drives spin at 300 rpm, 8" and HD 5.25" [drives] at 360 rpm. Then IBM went clever and let their HD [drive] spin at 360 rpm all the time using the non standard bit rate of 300 kb/s for DD. Foreign format drives must of necessity circumvent the standard BIOS routines and may or may not encounter trouble at the unusual speed."
"...[This] is something I read somewhere and remembered, but I can give no authoritative source and can't guarantee its correctness. The way I remeber was that the first HD drives were dual speed, later ones jumperable and used single (high) speed by IBM and the very latest omitted dual speed capability completely at the time when drive selects too were no longer present."
If you want to follow the discussion, use a Google search of comp.os.cpm to find an archive of it for Aug 13th 2002. These sources were quoted with permission. For additional information, read 720K 5.25" disks on 1.2Mb drives.
(The following will be confusing, read the following two paragraphs a few times.)
Many CP/M computers and some early IBM PC like computers used 80 track (96 TPI) 5.25 inch drives with double density format. This was sometimes called "quad density", as it was twice the data capacity of "double density" 40-track (48 TPI) drives. These drives, 40 or 80 track, rotated disks at 300 RPM. Later on, the PC compatibles went to "high density" 1.2M 5.25" drives and diskettes, with drives which were able to run at 360 RPM. They also ran at 300 RPM to support double and single density disks. They were still able to read and write the 720K diskettes, by slowing down the drives; and 360K disks by skipping tracks.
Still later, PC compatible floppy controllers changed the data rates instead of the rotation rate. Those floppy drives ran at 360RPM for both double and high density use. For more information, look at the 5.25" drive specifications at the top of this page, and also read this note.
Some very old computers (Commodore, Vector Graphic) used 100 TPI 5.25 inch drives. See this section on 100 tpi 5.25" drives for more information.
Consequently, it can be a challenge to use 5.25-inch "quad density" disks on modern computers, or worse to use modern 5.25 inch floppy drives on older computers. In the latter case, the challenge becomes "how do I set the rotation rate on this drive to 300 RPM only"? And, will the drive be "set" to behave like a "double density" drive, and expect the appropriate data rate? Many 5.25-inch "high density" floppy drives may not be able to run at 300RPM, or if they are it may be difficult to find out how to set them for double density use, and to provide all the signals otherwise expected by an older (non IBM like) computer.
The Web page linked here describes how to adapt a Teac FD-55GFR 1.2M drive to use for 800K (96TPI) formatted diskettes. Other notes there may apply to other brands of 1.2M drives. Note that the Web page is copywrited by the author, the Web link is to a licensed copy of that work.
Refer if you can to the hardware documentation on specific drives by brand and model, for capabilities and settings.
Using and formatting 360K 5.25-inch diskettes on a 1.2Mb floppy drive has been discussed over and over again, ever since the first high-density 1.2Mb drives and media were introduced for the IBM PC. People compain they can't read 360K diskettes formatted or written on a 1.2M drive to be read on a 360K drive. Briefly, the issue is that the 1.2M drive writes "thin" tracks, and also does not completely erase the "fat" tracks written on a 360K diskette. Specifications for the track width and the erase width for 360K drives, and for 1.2M (also 720K) drives are at the head of this document.
This issue arose again in comp.os.cpm in March 2006. My good friend Dave Dunfield posted what I thought was the most suscinct explanation in the thread "Using 360K disks in a 1.2Meg drive" as follows, with his permission:
The issue is that the 96tpi drive (80 track - 1.2M) has a narrower head than the 48 tpi drive (40 track - 360k).
If you write a blank/bulk-erased disk with 40 tracks on a 96 tpi drive, the tracks are just a bit narrower, however they will (usually) read fine with the fatter head of a 48tpi drive because there is no other magnetic pattern present to confuse it.
If you write a disk formatted or written previously on a 48tpi drive with 40 tracks on a 96 tpi drive, the narrow track lays down "in the middle" of the fatter existing tracks... Some of the original data pattern remains at the edges of the fatter track.
You can almost always read this back on the same drive, because the head reads in the same area as it was written, ignoring the previous data pattern.
You can usually read this back on another 96tpi drive, because unless it is grossly out of alignment, its narrow read track will still cover a much higher percentage of the new pattern .vs. the previous pattern - but the differences in alignment and the presense of the previous data at the edges (instead of the usual guard bands) will introduce more noise into the read data stream than you would see on a true 96 tpi track. This does make it more prone to disk errors.
When you try and read the disk on a 48tpi drive, the fatter read head will see both the new pattern (down the middle), and the previous data pattern near the edges - This has the effect of introducing significant "noise" into the read data stream which can make it quite unreliable - Some drives are a lot better than others [at reading the data correctly]. - Dave Dunfield
A comment was posted that some disks were readable anyway, for instance "So long as [the disk] had been formatted (full, not quick) in a 48TPI drive, I could write to the 48TPI disk in this one particular 96TPI drive and it would read in every 48TPI drive I tried it in." Dave said to follow-up:
Probably [because of] a combination of things... There are many tolerances to consider,and this particular scenario tends to magnify the effect of them. Some of the
most likely are:
- Write current
- Type of head/exact width/mounting alighment
- Head load pressure
- Track to track alignment
Basically, after you have written the 48tpi disk with a 96tpi track, you will have two conflicting data patterns - These tolerances will greatly affect how these two patterns are perceived by the read head. The stronger the 96tpi track appears relative to the remainder of the 48tpi track, the more reliably the disk will read in a 48 tpi drive.
I've personally found that this "works" (writing 48tpi formatted disks at 96tpi and then being able to read them back at 48tpi) quite frequently, but I wouldn't trust anything valuable to it ... seen enough cases where it didn't work as well. - Dave Dunfield
There was some mention of "increased erase current" but no specific data. See my discussion of reduced write current past track 43 on 8-inch drives for more information.
Here's a link to Daves Old Computers Web site, which will lead to some of the software and information Dave Dunfield has referenced.
I've moved this information to another Web page.
The discussion about diskette damage above shifted to how the spacing between diskette sectors affected disk read/write performance. Z80 systems which ran at 2MHz to 4MHz were too slow to read consecutive disk sectors, so "logical" sectors spaced apart to match processor speed. Fred J. Scipione posted (quoted here with permission) an informed response to Lee Hart's comments as below:
[Hart posted] So with our 20/20 hindsight, maybe there are ways to write a BIOS and/or > BDOS to speed up CP/M disk performance without hardware changes? > Obviously we can "hide" the problem with faster CPUs and more memory > but it that really necessary? In keeping with CP/M's KISS design > philosophy, would a new algorithm solve the problem much more = > elegantly?
[Scipione posted] "I have used a CP/M system with a 4 MHz Z80 CPU. It came set-up with 5.25" DD diskettes that used (10) 512 byte sectors and 5:1 interleaving in the sector marks during low level formatting. The BIOS handled the de-blocking with no further logical interleave.
"I re-wrote the format utility to allow user-specified sector mark interleaving. At 3:1, sequential file reads and writes took only 60% as long (3 revs per track vs 5). However, with 2:1 interleave things took 2.4 times as long. De-blocking and moving logical sectors from the BIOS buffer to the user's DMA target area must have taken more time than 1 sector of rotation, even though the BIOS used the Z80 block move instruction. Hence, the rate had dropped to 1.2 revs per sector or 12 revs per track.
"The big increase in transfer time (from 0.6x to 2.4x) when interleave drops too low is standard OS lore. If a program spent much processing time on each sector between reads, 3:1 might be too low and would then require 13 or 14 revs per track. For such a program, 4:1 or 5:1 interleave could be best.
"The point is, there is no new algorithm which would always improve speed. Its all in balancing the CPU speed vs the floppy's fixed transfer rate. More memory for full track buffering in the BIOS could get you down to 2 revs per track (if the DMA target transfer and program load will allow it). After that, a BDOS extension is required to allow multi-sector DMA which the BIOS can use to eliminate the logical sector DMA transfer with direct hardware sector transfers to/from the user memory. Then all you have to fight is file fragmentation :-)."
------end quote --------
In comp.os.cpm during June 2003, there was a discussion about use of 3.5 inch floppy drives in systems designed with 5.25 inch 360K or 720K (40 or 80 track) floppy drives. It was acknowledged that 720K (double density, not 1.4M high density) 3.5" diskettes would be supported, operating as if they were the 360K or 720K 5.25" disks expected by the floppy drive's controller. I've summarized that discussion and put it in this linked document.
In Feb 2005 there were some discussions in popular newsgroups, about converting old CP/M systems from 8-inch and 5.25-inch floppy drives, to 3.5" drives and media. Issues raised included support of FM or single density; finding old media; choices of formats. I decided these discusssions were worth preserving, as these issues come up over and over. One discussion was in the Classic-comp CCTECH discussion. The other occurred in Usenet discussion group comp.os.cpm.
In March 2008, in comp.os.cpm there was a discussion thread "has anyone succeeded in using 5 1/4's in Place of 8" drives". Someone responded to the question "how do you replace a 8-inch drive with a 5.25-inch drive?" with this Web link to a site apparently operated by Kees Stravers. The documents on that Web page include discussions from comp.os.cpm by Don Maslin and others from 1997.
Further along in the discussion, Rich Cini said "I actually have found that the [YE Data] YE-380 drives from the PC-AT work pretty well. I use them for 8" replacements on my CompuPro Disk 1 controller. They have head load solenoids and can be jumpered to have the motor run all the time just like 8" drives. A minor modification to the PCB is required to put the *READY signal on pin 34, but otherwise they work like a charm."
In Sept 2010, I was contacted by Larry Kraemer who successfully replaced 5.25-inch drives with 3.5" TEAC FD-235 Drives.. He gave me a fair amount of documentation, but here's the PDF of how he adapted 3.5" drives to a TRS-80 and a Ampro Little Board Z80 system. Contact me for more docs or to contact Larry. - Herb
See the notes below on 3.5-inch drives for related work.)
Part of the issue of using 3.5" drives to replace 5.25" or 8" drives, is the difference in rotation speed. If you read other notes on this page, you'll see that the higher data rate for 1.44" 3.5" diskettes, or 1.2M 5.25" diskettes, are accomodated by raising the rotation rate from 300RPM to 360RPM.
In Aug 2005 Chuck Guzis, a client of mine, commented via email to me on how to modify some 3.5" drives to change speed:
"I ran across [your] discussion on replacing 8" drives with 3.5" drives and the 300/360 rpm problem. On most recent Teac FD-235HF drives, there's a jumper pad, that if grounded, will make the 235 spin at 360 rpm. We've offered these (modified) drives for years for those who need to read old NEC 9800-series 1.3MB 3.5" floppies on their PC. Of course, most USB floppies will make the change automatically. Said pad is labeled "S4"--remove the 000 ohm SMD resistor connecting the pad to Vcc [+5 volts] and connect that pad ...to ground. Just that simple."
"The drive that I pulled off the shelf is has a PCB E950248-60A 611, who knows when it was from, but I suspect '95-98 or so. ...At any rate, you'll find that one side of S4 is connected to +5, the other isn't. Ground the side that isn't--you may have to look around a bit for a pad connected to ground."
In April 2009, Marcus Bennett posted in comp.os.cpm on similar work he did and reported it in a blog entry:
"Dear All: Get ready to use 3.5 inch diskette drives instead of those big and noisy 8 inch drives on your Cromemco (and therefore any other CPM) genre computers: [link to blog entry at majzel.com]"
"Note that this requires trivial modification of your disk controller, in my case the Cromemco 64FDC to connect the 8 inch disk drive ready of pin 22 to [a 5.25-inch drive's] ready line which is pin 34. There is a link in my article to a previous post showing how that was done already.- Regards, marcus."
here's the link to his prior work on a Teac FD-55GFR 1.2MB 5.25" diskette drive.
update in 2011: A number of Japan-designed 3.5" 1.44MB drives will also operate at what they call "1.6M" operation by speeding the rotation rate from 300RPM to 360 RPM. Look for manuals or data sheets or advertizing sheets by drive brand and model, for more information. The Sony MPF920 drive is also produced as the MPF820 as capable of 1.6M/360RPM operation. - Herb
This is a brief note, to cover Apple's Macintosh 3.5" floppy drives. Apple supported 3.5" floppy diskettes in their own 800K and 1.4MB diskette formats. Their drives are different from the Windows/MS-DOS and earlier computer's drives which most of this Web page describes. I describe more details on another Web page.
The old Apple Macintosh 3.5" floppy drives are supported by Apple's very specific floppy controller software and hardware. Their Mac floppy drives use a 20-pin interface, cabled to their computers. Also, their floppy drive rotates at different rates depending on which track the head is located, under hardware/software control.
Apple developed what's called a "3 of 5" "GCR" data scheme for their floppy drive format. That's a description of how the bits are written and read. Apple also has a scheme for how files are described (directory) and the file data is distributed (sectors and clusters) on the diskette. The method is called HFS (a very early version was called MFS). Use these keywords to find details elsewhere. However, because these features are under software control, many Macs with internal (non-USB) floppy drives CAN read Window/MS-DOS format diskettes as described below.
By contrast, Windows/MS-DOS 3.5" diskettes are written on drives with 34 pin interfaces. The recording scheme at the binary level is MFM and at fixed rotation rates (referenced elsewhere in this document). The file directory and sector layout is called "FAT12". The Windows and MS-DOS hardware to do the binary scheme was established in the 1980's and is a part of the chip hardware and BIOS. Consequently these computers can't read Mac-format diskettes, unless additional hardware is used.
Since the features of diskette format are established in the computer, not the drive, one can't simply "hook up" a Mac drive to a Windows computer (or vice versa) to read the other computer's diskettes. Also, USB floppy drives can't read Mac-format disks:the microcontroller in the USB drive doesn't know "how" to read HFS Mac disks, only FAT12 MS-DOS/Windows floppy diskettes.
In comp.os.cpm during June 2003, there was a discussion about use of 3.5 inch floppy drives in systems designed with 5.25 inch 360K or 720K (40 or 80 track) floppy drives. In that thread, Amardeep S Chana referred to 300KBps data rates to HD 5.25 drives. Double density 5.25" drives require a 250Kbps bit rate at 300rpm; a 20% faster data rate to 300Kbps compensates for a 20% faster (HD) rotation rate of 360rpm. His posted comments were (quoted here with permission):
"Only 8" and 5.25" High Capacity (1.2M) drives operate at 360rpm. Some 5.25" 1.2M models had the spindle speed step down to 300rpm for DD media compatibility but later a 20% faster data rate of 300Kbps was used instead of a slower spindle speed." I asked him privately for details and and his response was:
"Probably all IBM PC/AT compatible applications of 1.2MB drives are single speed 360rpm. All IBM PC/AT compatible controllers (and their Super-I/O descendents) support the 300Kbps data rate. It is the standard.
"Some 1.2MB drives, particularly early models, offer the dual spindle option. This was probably a migration path for non-IBM systems of that era. TEAC [model] FD55GFR drives commonly have this jumper option but come from the factory jumpered for the single speed 360rpm PC/AT standard."
Since I've seen posted requests for those drives, and sold a few myself, There has been "recent" interest in dual-speed 5.25" drives for systems that don't provide 300Kbps data rates. Thanks to Chana for sharing his insights on this.
Some 5.25-inch drives used a track spacing of 100 tracks per inch and supported 77 tracks in use. This was instead of 96 tpi for 80 tracks, or the older 48 tpi for 40 tracks. Consequently disks written at 100tpi are not readable or writable on 96 tpi drives and vice versa. The heads simply miss the tracks!
Thanks to Amardeep S Chana for the information immediately below, from his response to inquiries in comp.os.cpm in Aug & Sept 2003. Also thanks to Andrew Lynch for 100 tpi drive info in 2007; and Mike Stein for discussion of 96 TPI-certified diskettes in Dec 2007.
> What can anyone tell me about Tandon TM 100-4M 5.25" floppy drives. I > have not run across a 4M version. The seller indicates that the drive > "Features 100 TPI DSR" ??????
The 'M' is not a revision indicator but indicates a model with 100tpi INSTEAD of 96tpi. This was for compatibility with a Micropolis disk drive geometry that was not very popular. They were 77 cylinder drives and NOT media compatible with 40 and 80 cylinder drives. [note from Herb: "cylinder" is equivalent to "track".]
> Is this a quad density drive???
DSDD 96tpi 80 cylinder drives are sometimes (imprecisely) called quad density. The TM100-4M is not compatible to that format.
> Could it be used in say a Model 1 or Model III as a replacement for a
> single or double density drive???
Yes. But don't expect to read standard 40 or 80 cylinder disks in it. Nor can you read its disks on any other type of common drive.
For Radio Shack external drives you will run into a connector alignment problem. The SA400 and Texas Peripherals drives that came from the factory had a different offset from the edge of the signal connector to the side of the drive body. Thus other makes of drives such as Tandon won't mate with the data connector in those enclosures." - Amardeep S Chana
In Oct 2007 Andrew Lynch provided a list of 100tpi 5.25" floppy drives, used in Vector Graphic systems, as follows: Tandon TM-100-4M; Micropolis (aka, Micropolis II, 1016, and many other model names); Teac FD-50C; MPI or CDC, make unknown. Another source suggested the Micropolis drives were 1015-IIB and 1016-II. Related discussions with Andrew and other Vector Graphic owners at that time, discussed use of 100 TPI drives from the same manufacturers, in Commodore model 8050 and 8250 dual-floppy external drives. For more discussion and photos check these Vector Graphic S-100 system notes.
In Dec 2007 Andrew described some hard-sectored diskettes sold for 96TPI (and so 100TPI) use: "Herb, I have only a few 16 sector 96/100tpi [-branded] floppy disks. Here are the ones I do have:
Datalife MD 557-16-18257 DSDD
Dysan 205/2D 802066 DSDD
Dysan 205/1D 801219 SSDD
BASF 2D FlexiDisk 5.25 DSDD
Note, DD in this context refers to MFM versus SD for FM. The disks are 96/100tpi which some vendors call Quad Density (QD). It is my understanding these disks are still the DD 300 oersted media rather than the HD 600 oersted [high-density] rated media." - Andrew Lynch
Some of these vendors marked their boxes expressly as 96/100TPI or "100% tested 96TPI" and so forth. In 2007 some Vector Graphic system users reported disk read problems when using disks rated or labled as 48 TPI, but less or no problems with diskettes rated or labled for 96 TPI. There is some debate as to whether these latter disks are "different media" because they are apparently of a higher quality. - Herb Johnson
In Feb 2005, there was a discussion in comp.os.cpm and in cctalk/cctech (classiccmp.com maillists) about "standardizing" use of 3.5" drives on older systems that used 5.25" and 8" drives. For an early CP/M 3.5" format reference, someone suggested the Epson PX-8 which had an external 3.5" drive option called the PF-10. But as Fred Cisin pointed out to me in private correspondence below, that drive is a bit unusual. (My edits for clarity are in 's.)
"The Epson Geneva PX-8 [drive] was NOT "normal". It's almost as abnormal as 100tpi 5.25". The Epson Geneva PX-8 disks that I have seen used a 67.5 tpi 3.5" drive (40 tracks per side). THOSE drives are VERY hard to find; I have ONE of them. I doubt that there is ANYBODY on [the discussion lists], other than those who have a PX-8, who own a compatible drive. "Normal" 3.5" drives, whether "720K" or "1.4M", are 135 tpi. YES, you could "double-track" [one of those drives, but] introduce track width problems. Epson did NOT double step. They used a 67.5 tpi drive, which has a wider head [gap?] than a 135tpi drive. But, to use that otherwise good idea, consider other 3.5" CP/M formats that use a "NORMAL" drive."
The earliest 5.25 inch floppy drives only supported 35 tracks; subsequent drives were 40 track by adding five additional tracks. Later, 80 tracks were provided by halving the 40-track spacing. As a result, early 5.25-inch diskette envelopes had a slightly smaller window for read/write head. Following is some discussion of that history. My edits are in 's. - Herb Johnson in posts and private emails of March 2005, Allison Parent wrote:
"The older [35-track media] has a [window] length of 1.210 inches, [from NorthStar DOS] 4.0 distribution media. I have about 40 pieces of media from before mid-1979 that have the smaller hole. All used with hard sector NS MDS [systems]. The [40-track] standard is 1.370 inches I have hard sector and soft sector diskettes that meets that size.
The [hole] width is 0.5 inches for all. From the outer edge of envelope [the hole begins at] 0.13 inches. Then a 1.21 inch opening [for 35 track media]...the standard is 1.37.
[Regarding brands of 35-track diskettes,] some only have NS* factory label, nothing else to pin them down, but are circa 1977-1978. The few other are Dysan, Verbatim Datalife (MD-525-10), Wabash. I also have two soft-sector disks that are marked "Icom Microperipherals" that are soft sector ([formatted with a] 1771) with DEBBI/imsai [controller] and FDOS-III System V1.0. that have the smaller hole.
Many do not have any label but, I tended to buy Dysan and Verbatim back then. I know that some of the floppy media was sold through Shugart with their label. For the first years the minifloppy was a Shugart thing. I also know that the NS* MDS was the first complete minifloppy system under 1000$ then as I was an early adoptor as a major improvement to the then Altair 8800. So in the fall of '77 I was the proud owner of a drive, board kit and software for a mere $699.
Less than a year later [in 1978] the Altair was retired for a NS* Horizon CPU and crate ( had the disk and memory already). I encountered [the size conflict] back then, as the third drive I bought was a [Shugart] SA-400L and I was having trouble getting past track 36-7 when I was trying to format [diskettes] for more space (NS*dos space hacking project). Somewhere around 1979-1980 there was a standards change and the window was opened up to accomodate 40 tracks. Right about the same time, the SA-400L (40 track version of the SA-400) was introduced. I might add that Shugart sold a lot of the 400Ls as DEC used them in the Robin and TI on the 99/4 home console (disk was 400L). Tandy's later machines [also used them]."
Around 1980 I was with NEC and we were launching the 765 floppy controller and guess what, people were having problems with 40 track drives with some of the then new sa400L drives and Tandon TM100s and others. Every case of "cannot (or doesn't always) format past track 35-37 with 5.25 floppy" was old media with the smaller hole. Once pointed out I'd hear something that translated into "@#%*" due to wasted time." [end quote]
Randy McLaughlin wrote, in private correspondence on March 2005:
"My first floppy system was a NorthStar system, I used the [35 track] smaller window media from a variety of manufacturers.
The issue was the first mass produced 5.25" drive was a [Shugart] SA400 which only handled 35 tracks. The drive was used in a variety of electronic equipment (not all were computers). The [same mechanism] was also used by Apple for their Apple II's (no index sensor & Apples own electronics). Later other manufacturers made compatible but "better" drives that had 40 tracks and faster step rates. Shugart then came out with the SA400L but I don't believe many were sold.
Shugart sold media for it: SA 105 & SA 107 were hard sectored (I'm not sure which was 10 and which was 16) while SA 104 was soft sectored.
Cromemco and other manufacturers warned us to be careful of what media we were buying because using the smaller windowed media in the drives sold by Cromemco would rip the felt pad off that pressed the media against the head. Of course the newer media [for 40 track use] worked just fine on the SA400's.
NorthStar never supported 40 tracks, not even for double sided. There was support for 80 tracks though. I never understood why NorthStar would throw away (not use) full capacity on later drives." [end quote]
On Nov-Dec 2005 I had an enjoyable email exchange with Chuck Guzis, a founder and CEO of Sydex Inc. Some of that discussion is referenced on my Web links about Sydex products. In the course of that exchange he mentioned his odd-duck drives, such as for 3.25-inch diskettes. I "corrected" him to suggest he meant 3-inch which was another but briefly-used odd size. Chuck assured me that 3 and a quarter-inch drives and media once existed, and he provide a photo of both. Here's what he said:
"Well, I'll tell you what I know about them (I've got 2 as well as a box of diskettes). Back in the early 80's there were two microfloppy initiatives being promoted. One, with Dysan, Shugart and I can't remember who else advocated a 3.25" floppy made along the lines of the 5.25" model. The other camp was Sony, HP and few other manufacturers with the modern 3.5" hardshell floppy. But the Sony drives at the time spun at 600 RPM, not 300. This was clearly going to raise hob with the OEMs who just needed a drop-in replacement for the 5.25" media, which the 3.25" standard was. I can remember using the 600 RPM Sony OAD-1 drives on a Preis CP/M luggable and was very impressed with their nice snappy response.
"When HP began to ship systems with the Sony 3.5" 300 RPM drive, it pretty much ended the controversy and the 3.25" proposal died.
"The drives and diskettes were sent to me by a fellow who presided over the housecleaning at Dysan Santa Clara before they closed up shop there. I'd seen these drives before, but labeled "Shugart Venture". These have no nameplates, serial numbers or any clue as to the manufacturer, but the ICs have date codes in early 1984, so that at least gives a clue to the timeframe. The disk clamping arrangement is very interesting. A little tray, when pushed with the finger, slides about 1/2" forward. One places the diskette on the tray and then pushes the tray back into the drive. There are LEDs on the front for "write enabled" as well as for activity. Write protection works exactly as it does for 5.25" media--there's a little sheet of black sticky tabs to be applied to the diskette jacket. Each diskette has its own paper sleeve, just like the 5.25" stuff.
"I believe that if you prowl the archives of the likes of EDN for 1984, you may find a good run-down on the whole affair. AFAIK, the 3.25" media was never used on a production machine, but I could be mistaken.
In a follow-up to the above discussion, Chuck Guzis mentioned some other odd drive formats: "... there's the 2.8" hardshell floppies used on the Smith Corona PWP. Not much of a floppy, really--the head's coupled to a follower connected to a grooved disc that is coupled through a clutch mechanism to the spindle drive motor. Works kind of like a windshield wiper--get the disk spinning, pulse the clutch and the head traces a continuous spiral down the disk, then quickly returns to the rest position. You get about 60K of MFM on one of these. The interface is about 6 wires, including power. And didn't Zenith try to float a 2" floppy at one point?" (It was the Zenith MiniSport laptop.- Herb)
I have technical manuals for a number of 3-inch and 3.5-inch floppy drives on this Web page.
In June 2010 I read a mention by a Emmanuel Roche of a Nintendo Famicom Disk System (FDS) with 2.8" floppy media which was supported by Mitsumi, for the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) in the late 1980's. The drive model number is HVC-022. A Web search will find more information. This is likely only of interest to Nintendo collectors.
Diskettes are or were sold as "single density" or SD, "double density" or DD, or "high density" or HD. These are all descriptions about how a diskette is formatted or constructed for use. It is unclear to many users whether you can use or reformat "single density" diskettes for "double density", and vice versa - the short story is YOU CAN. (High density or HD diskettes are discussed in another section.) In my technical descriptions of disk media above, I list each type of diskette by size and density, and list the technical specifics of the media and its associated floppy drive. The thing that rotates around inside the envelope is called the "media", that is what holds the data. It turns out that "single density" and "double density" media for each diskette/drive size have the same "coercivity". That is, the coating on the media for SD and DD have the same magnetic qualities; and the coating determines the features of use.
So there is NO PHYSICAL DIFFERENCE between SD and DD media - only that some disks were packaged pre-formatted, and it's the FORMATTING which determines whether a diskette is single or double density. But since the boxes for these disks are usually labled as EITHER "SD" or "DD", even if they are NOT formatted, it's hard to convince people there is no difference. This holds for 8-inch or 5.25 inch diskettes: 3.5-inch diskettes were rarely if ever sold as single density I believe.
Don't confuse single and double DENSITY with single and double SIDED diskettes. Sides refers to one side or the other of the diskette envelope and to the media. See other sections of this document, and the technical descriptions, for details.
Also, floppy drive controllers may or may not be able to format, read or write all three formats - SD, DD or HD. Discussion of that issue was raised in 2005 in some discussion groups; edited content may be posted at this site soon, and a link added here accordingly. - Herb JOhnson 3/05
High density diskettes and their issues are discussed in another note.
The note above on single or double density diskettes says you can use either of those for SD or DD purposes after reformatting. But you CANNOT use DS or DD diskettes reliably with high density (HD) formatting and use. Read the notes above for more details and some terminology. The fact is that HIGH density (HD) media have a different magnetic coating than SD or DD media, for either HD 5.25 inch or HD 3.5 inch diskettes. There are also differences in how the drives work at HD versus SD or DD. It is less clear, however, if HD disks can be used reliably with SD or DD formatting.
(I said in 2005: Newsgroup discussions in 2005 about using HD disks at SD or DD will soon be edited and posted at this Web site; a link will be included here accordingly." - that has not yet happened, sorry. - Herb)
In July 2009 there was a discussion in a Heath/Zenith email list, about using high-density 3.5" diskettes at double-density data rates. I asked Chuck Guzis, formerly of Sydex Inc and a data recovery specialist, for his experience and views. Here's Chuck's discussion about use of high-density 3.5" diskettes versus double-density.
Some diskettes and drives were made and sold as single sided (SS) or double sided (DS). "Sided" refers to formatting and use of only one side, or to both sides, of the diskette media. (Don't confuse single and double SIDED with single and double DENSITY.) The oldest diskette drives had only had one read write head, for one side only. Likewise, old single sided diskettes may have had only one side with a magnetic coating, or one non-defective side. Other differences vary between 8-inch, 5.25-inch and 3.5-inch diskettes. Eight-inch diskettes have a "window" punched in the diskette envelope to give access to the corresponding index hole in the media. That window is in different locations for 8-inch SS diskettes versus DS diskettes, and double sided 8-inch drives can see that difference. (8-inch SS drives will not see a DS diskette's index hole, which protects that DS disk from misuse.) For 5.25 inch or 3.5 inch diskettes, I know of no difference in the diskette envelope plastic case between SS and DS disks. However 3.5-inch high density (HD) diskettes have an additional hole in the corner which allows a HD 3.5-inch drive to identify such diskettes.
In the old days, some people created "flippy diskettes", by punching new index holes in 5.25-inch or 8-inch diskettes such that the diskette could be "flipped" over and used on both sides by single-sided floppy drives. This often worked because some single sided media were in fact double sided media which may have been considered defective on one side. Or, double sided diskettes were simply formatted and labled as single sided. A "flippy" modification is not possible for 3.5-inch diskettes because of their hard case and its sliding door. - Herb JOhnson 3/05
In Sept 2005, a customer wanted to replace a Hewlett Packard 3.5" drive (9122C), made by Sony (MP-F73W-50), with a modern PC Windows Pentium 3.5" drive by Samsung. The old drive replaced some ground signals with power and did not use a seperate power connector. He compiled the following list of signals, and wired an adapter accordingly. He also purchased from me a set of Sony documents for the MP-F73W-00D and 01D drives. An image of his Sony MP-F73W-50 drive is at this link. He says:
"The following data is a combined chart of the data from the HP manual and data from a pdf file for a new Sony drive #MPF920-Z. Use a fixed-width font to view it:
Pin# Signal (Old Sony) Signal (New Sony) Pin# Signal (Old Sony) Signal (New Sony) 1 Disc Change Reset NC 2 Disc Change Indicator NC 3 +5V Key 4 Density Bit NC 5 +5V Ground 6 Drive Select NC 7 +5V Ground 8 Index Pulse Index 9 +5V Ground 10 Drive Select 0 NC 11 +5V Ground 12 Drive Select 1 Drive Select 1 13 Ground Ground 14 Drive Select 2 NC 15 Ground Ground 16 Motor On Motor On 17 Ground Ground 18 Direction Select Direction 19 Ground Ground 20 Step Step 21 Ground Ground 22 Write Data Write Data 23 Ground Ground 24 Write Gate Write Gate 25 Ground Ground 26 Track 0 Indicator Track 00 27 Ground Ground 28 Write Protect Indicator Write Protect 29 +12V Ground 30 Read Data Read Data 31 +12V Ground 32 Head Select Head 1 Select 33 +12V Ground 34 Ready Disc Change (note: "new Sony" corresponds to other 3.5" drive pinouts as well. - Herb)
"I made an adapter to reroute the various pins, and installed a brand new Samsung FBT6 floppy in the HP drive using the adapter, but things are not quite there yet. I will get the scope going to see how things behave with the old drives vs. the new drives. I'm sure I'll figure out the differences and get things going."
"One observation: The p.c. board layout...for the MP-F73W-00D and 01D drives is very similar to the layout of my Sony MFD-73W-50 drives. [Docs show] that the odd row of the 34-position connector, which usually has all of its pins connected to ground (except pin #1 in the "00D" version), is actually divided into three sections, just like my Sony MFD-73W-50 drives. The pin assignments for the 34-position connector as shown on page 3-1 show that the entire odd row is the "return" (ground) connection (pin #1 of the "00D" drive is the DISK CHANGE RESET" pin), but you can see on the layout that the three sections of the odd row can be tied together or kept separate by using or deleting jumpers RJ1 and RJ2. On my Sony MFD-73W-50 drive, pins 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 are kept separate (RJ1 deleted) and are used for the +12V supply connection, while pins 29, 31 and 33 are kept separate (RJ2 deleted) and used for the +5V supply connection. Pins #13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, and 27 are ground. All of these drive models have a place on the p.c. board for a standard 4-position power connector, but in the MFD-73W-50, that connector is not installed on the p.c. board. Instead, the +5V supply is routed from pins 29, 31 and 33 of the 34-position connector to pin #4 of the standard 4-position power connector by adding JP4, and the +12V supply is routed from pins 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 of the 34-position connector to pin #1 of the standard 4-position power connector by adding JP3."
>> I noticed the old SONY drive has a "density select" line. I suggest >> you look closely at how the old drive performs a "density" change. New >> drives are a lot smarter than the old drives, and new drives may make >> this change automatically and in a number of ways. One thing some >> modern drives AND SYSTEMS do is not change motor speed, but change the >> BIT RATE of data going to the drive."
"Regarding the "density select," I have that on my list of things to consider. I tried a 720k disc in the new drive and got it to perform a directory listing, which it would not do with a 1.44M disc. But it got temperamental again after that. Lots to check. Disc Change Reset (pin #1 on the old Sony, NC on the new Sony), Disc Change Indicator (pin #2 on the old Sony, NC on the new Sony), etc., are things I will look at. But I'm using a new Samsung drive, and it may be doing things a bit differently too. It has deleted most of the ground pins on the connector, apparently because they are redundant and they can save a penny or two."
In Dec-Jan 2006 a customer was looking for replacement drive belts for his Shugart 800 8-inch floppy drives. (The diskette hub is driven by a belt from the motor.) He suggested the following links to Russell Industries:
By my measurements, the belt width is .195 to .2 inches. The thickness is about .031 inches. Length is ??.
The "Shugart SA800/801" parts manual simply lists a part number: 50356, Belt (60Hz). Note that drives built for 50Hz used a different sized hub and so a different belt length. Another shugart manual says the index pulse timing is 166.67ms ± 3.33ms. That's from a rotation rate of 360RPM. I read that spec as an error of ± 2 percent OVERALL. Data bit rates are 4us ± 400ns and 2us ± 200ns: that suggests a "bump" in the belt must not cause those sort of error. You will have to do the math on that.
Regarding measuring the belt, measuring thickness and width is easy enough, I'd use a micrometer. Measuring length is tough. Dont stretch the belt straight to get some length, you'll crack the belt at the ends. I would take a THREAD, preferably a heavy one, and tape it along the THIN EDGE of the belt with some masking tape. Then I'd carefully CUT the thread where it overlaps with a sharp knife or blade. Of course you can then remove the thread and measure it on a GOOD metal rule, not some old wood yardstick.
In January 2010, another customer contacted me about his experiences in obtaining floppy drive belts. Read about it on this Web page.
This information on M2FM / MMFM and Intel, ISIS is moved to another Web page.
Floppy drives use long data cables, especially 8-inch drives. These need a resistive termination at the drive end to improve signal quality. YOU can get read and write errors if no terminator is used, or the wrong one is used. Usually the terminator is a resistor pack, with each resistor going from a signal line to +5 volts. On 8-inch and older 5.25 inch drives, there was an IC socket to accomodate this resistor pack, because you terminate ONLY the LAST floppy drive (of two or more) at the farthest end of the floppy cable from the controller. Newer floppy drives are often used as the ONLY drive, so the terminator is soldered in. Don't confuse the "terminator pack" with the "drive jumpers" which set addressing and features, on the oldest drives they too used an IC socket. They are NOT "terminators".
Some people can make up a resistor pack with a "header" and seperate resistors all soldered up. You can buy resistor packs in a variety of values. But be sure to use the correct resistor values, and the correct number and connections for them. Check the drive's schematic or specifications if you have them.
But GENERALLY 8-inch and older 5.25 inch drives use a set of eight 150 ohm resistors, all tied to +5 volts. They are either all in parallel across a 16-pin package; or are in a package with a single row of 9 or more pins. I've also seen 120 ohm specifications for one 8-inch drive (close enough to 150). I've seen 100 ohm resistor packs soldered on 5.25-inch drives. On newer 3.5-inch and 5.25-inch drives, these resistor packs may not be removable or accessable. Generally this becomes an issue only for the oldest of floppy drives, and most often for 8-inch drives.
SOME 5.25 inch drives, like the Siemens FD100-5, use a pair of resistors per receiver line: 220 ohms to +5, 330 ohms to ground. CHECK THE DOCUMENTATION if you can get it. I don't at this time have specifics for 3.5-inch drives, and it will likely depend on when the drive was produced (for PC's or for older non-PC systems).
For a long and technical discussion about termination of busses, cables; and with some tutorial; see this Web page of mine.
The following remarks were posted in the Google Group for Cromemcoin April 2010, titled "IMD activity continues". IMD is Dave Dunfield's imagedisk format for capturing diskette images using a Windows/MS-DOS/Linux type computer. the remarks are from Amardeep Chana, whom I've quoted many times on my Web site. - Herb Johnson
Reading 5.25" floppy diskettes on an NEC 765 based controller that were written with a WD controller tends to be challenging due to the abridged post index gap. I have experience with both Cromix/CDOS disks and TRS-80 Model III disks that exhibited this problem. It turned out that the NEC 765 core [design chip hardware] becomes insensitive to the index address mark for a short period after the index pulse is detected. If the gap is short enough (which it often is in these formats) the controller will not see that index address mark and consequently never enter read-decode mode. This results in never being able to find a sector.
I suspect this is what's happening because you had some success when formatting the disk on the PC then writing to it on the Cromemco. The PC controller (765 core) will create a sufficient post index gap at the cost of other gaps on that track.
There is another means to work around that. Years ago, before the Catweasel was available, I devised a means to fool the controller by installing a switch in wire #8 of the [34-pin mini]floppy bus -- the wire that carries the index signal. You need at least one pulse to get through to initialize the controller's state machine properly after inserting the diskette. Attempt a read with the switch closed (it will probably fail) then open the switch and you'll find that even the most difficult gaps will now be readable. The remainder of the disk read operation will succeed -- you only need to toggle it once per disk insertion. Of course, you can't write in this state, but that's not needed for imaging.
Hope that helps a bit. - Sincerely, Amardeep
(See this Web page on floppy drives for discussion of the Catweasel product. - Herb)
Copyright © 2014 Herb Johnson